home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT1507>
- <title>
- Apr. 26, 1993: Is Nike Getting Too Big for Its Shoes?
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Apr. 26, 1993 The Truth about Dinosaurs
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- SPORT, Page 55
- Is Nike Getting Too Big for Its Shoes?
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Concern is growing that the sportswear firm's lavish endorsement
- deals give it undue power and influence
- </p>
- <p>By DAVID E. THIGPEN
- </p>
- <p> Every sports fan has seen the flashy TV commercials:
- Michael Jordan, leaping for the basket, seems to break free of
- gravity as he goes up, up and still higher up. The trajectory
- has been the same for the company whose shoes the commercial
- touts. Since its founding 21 years ago, Nike, the Beaverton,
- Oregon, sportswear conglomerate, has soared to greater and
- greater heights, becoming the $3.7 billion-a-year titan of the
- industry. The key has been Nike's endorsement contracts with
- such top professional athletes as Jordan, baseball's Bo Jackson
- (``Bo knows..."), football's Jerry Rice and, to a lesser
- extent, several hundred others. But as it has lavished ever more
- millions of dollars on such tie-ins, Nike has seen something
- else rise along with its profile and its profits: concern in the
- sports world about whether it exerts too much control over its
- player-pitchmen and wields too much influence over the sports
- in which they compete.
- </p>
- <p> Nike's increasing clout has long troubled the National
- Football League, and even the mighty National Basketball
- Association. Two years ago, Nike ordered 90 of the athletes it
- has under contract to withdraw from part of the rich
- apparel-licensing deal by which the N.B.A. sells the players'
- likenesses on shirts and hats--depriving the league of $1.5
- million a year in revenue. In February Nike, along with Michael
- Jordan, wrestled from the N.B.A. the rights to the
- multimillion-dollar market for T shirts bearing Jordan's image.
- "In marketing, Nike is far more powerful than the league," says
- N.B.A. deputy commissioner Russ Granik. "They are the giant, and
- we're the mouse." Player representatives, seeing endorsement
- money rolling in to Nike athletes, are loath to criticize the
- company. "There are no rules barring what Nike is doing," says
- Charles Grantham, executive director of the N.B.A. Players
- Association.
- </p>
- <p> There are no National Collegiate Athletic Association
- rules either against what Nike does in college basketball, but
- that too has raised concern. The company pays millions of
- dollars to the coaches and athletic programs of at least 60
- colleges--including Georgetown, Michigan and Seton Hall--in
- order to be the exclusive supplier of the players' shoes. Last
- week Nike was negotiating a deal to pay Duke's coach, Mike
- Krzyzewski, a reported $1 million bonus and $375,000 a year.
- Other shoe and apparel companies have similar arrangements--Reebok with Notre Dame, for example, and L.A. Gear with North
- Carolina State.
- </p>
- <p> Nike's director of sports marketing, Steve Miller,
- describes the transactions as a way for universities to raise
- additional funds for their athletic programs. Other observers
- question whether they violate the nominally amateur spirit of
- collegiate sports. Through them Nike positions itself to funnel
- future stars into its fold and in some cases guarantees them
- millions of dollars in endorsement deals before they sign with
- a pro team.
- </p>
- <p> Nike's influence contributed to a sticky situation last
- fall: two-sport wonder Deion Sanders was criticized for playing
- football and baseball over a single weekend when both his teams--the Falcons and the Braves--would have preferred his
- undivided attention. Sanders became severely exhausted and
- dehydrated in the process. Why did he do it? Partly because of
- his own competitive drive, partly because his Nike contract pays
- him $1 million a year as a two-sport athlete but only $100,000
- as a one-sport athlete. The issue is, as one player agent puts
- it, "Will Nike's interest always be the same as the athlete's?"
- </p>
- <p> Undaunted, the company recently opened Nike Sports
- Management, a division that offers athletes "total management
- contracts," including endorsements, career guidance and
- marketing advice. The first three to sign: basketball stars
- Alonzo Mourning and Harold Miner and former Notre Dame
- quarterback Rick Mirer. Under the deal, Nike represents
- Mourning, for example, in nearly every aspect of his life, right
- down to finding him a townhouse (a Nike representative had the
- shower heads and counters raised for the 6-ft. 10-in. player),
- choosing what soda he drinks and telling him where to buy his
- stereo equipment.
- </p>
- <p> His Nike contract, reportedly for a guaranteed $16 million
- over five years, supplied Mourning and his outside agent, David
- Falk (whom Nike helped select), with decisive leverage in
- contract negotiations between Mourning and the Charlotte, North
- Carolina, Hornets. "The Hornets knew I really didn't have to
- take anything," remembers Mourning, who held out until the
- fourth game of the season. He finally won a $26 million contract--more than he had hoped for. No wonder that shortly after the
- Hornets drafted him, Mourning answered as he did when the
- Sporting News asked whom he really plays for. "I work for Nike,"
- he replied.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-